Friday, April 30, 2010

April 16- Maritime Preservation


Our class met in Liberty Square at the Fort Sumter Museum and boarding station. We met National Park Service Ranger, Carlin Timmons who provided us with a good backdrop for the exhibits. Joining us was University of South Carolina alum and Park Guide Nate Johnson. The museum is provided for those waiting to take the ferry to Fort Sumter. The panels cover from colonial Charleston to the out-break of the Civil War.

I appreciated the frankness with which Ms. Timmons discussed the exhibit development. The exhibit panels were revised several times and public input was encouraged. Those on the exhibit committee felt that the panels needed to show diversity and awareness of audience—which was a challenge due to the topic. I think that the panels as a whole try to interpret too many voices, but then, how could they avoid that? Some of the panels on the African-American experience use the well-known African-Americans of the time—I feel that they should have tried for more unique examples of lesser known African-Americans. The panels are text heavy and center on six themes: Colonial Roots of the Conflict, Ambiguities of the Constitution, Antebellum United States, Charleston in 1860, South Carolina Declares Its Independence, and Fort Sumter Countdown to Conflict.

Next was our ferry ride to Fort Sumter. For more information on Fort Sumter, follow this link: http://www.nps.gov/fosu/.


Fort Sumter was built from 1820s to 1861 when it was interrupted by Confederate fire on the Federally controlled fort. Because the fort is on a man-made island situated on a shoal in the Charleston harbor, extreme conditions have contributed to its further deterioration. It was decommissioned in 1947 by the War Department and was sold to the Park Service.
The fort is currently a mixture of the original brick construction/ruins paired with ca. 1898 concrete. The fort is not being restored, nor is it being rehabbed. It is only being preserved and in an ever increasing state of disrepair. Foot traffic and weather are dangerous combinations—both of which are being addressed as best as time and budgets allow. I feel as though more work needs to be done at the Fort in interpreting all aspects of the war and to move the focus away from just being about the north or south.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Our next, and final Charleston Field School visit, was at the Warren Lasch Conservation Center to view the Hunley. The Hunley is a late 19th century submarine prototype that crashed after it successfully attacked The U.S.S. Housatonic. For more information, follow this link: http://www.hunley.org/. The Hunley was 4 feet tall, 3.5 feet wide, and 40 feet long and had a crew of 8. The Hunley is a controversial issue that some see as representing white supremacy, southern aggression, northern aggression, etc. Whatever people may believe it represents, I feel as though the Hunley is an invaluable relic of national history. Not in order to promote the Confederate cause, but in order to preserve a piece of technological, military, and yes, South Carolina history. Enormous preservation monies are being poured into the conservation efforts surrounding the Hunley. Visiting the lab was a treat—we got to see the science behind the history. I was impressed with the conservation of the piece of cashmere fabric belonging to a vest of one of the crew.
Before we saw the Hunley in its conservation tank, we talked to Head Conservator, Paul Mardikian about the challenges facing maritime preservation. Dangerous, expensive, and hard work seem to sum up the field of maritime preservation. Challenges arise because artifacts can be severely altered chemically if taken from water to air. In some instances chemical reactions can occur. In those cases, immersion in salt, lack of oxygen, and removal of moisture are the recommended steps in conserving the artifact. The conservators of the Hunley will have to take a mitigation approach due to the composite nature of the artifact. Meanwhile, contributions to the research and development of new conservation methods make this a truly field worthy subject.

April 2- Landscapes and Environments

River facade of Drayton Hall, 3380 Ashley River Road. For more information, go to http://www.draytonhall.org/.

Drayton Hall is owned and operated by the National Trust for Historic Preservation as a museum. I like what the website says about its mission and about the house:

"Drayton Hall is different. It’s the real thing, and we are bound by our mission to preserve the property—that is, to keep it in near-original condition just as the National Trust received it from the Drayton family in 1974. Instead of being restored to the vision of those who lived centuries after it was built, Drayton Hall is an artifact that has survived the American Revolution, the Civil War, the earthquake of 1886, hurricanes like Hugo, and maybe most surprisingly today, urban sprawl."

Drayton Hall is a ca.1738 Georgian Palladian style house built and once owned by one of Charleston’s wealthiest men, John Drayton (1715-1779). But showcasing Drayton’s story is a far cry from what Drayton Hall's interpretation is at the site. Educating and expanding the knowledge and interpretation of those enslaved at Drayton is also important to the staff. We met Executive Director George McDaniel, Director of Preservation Carter Hudgins, and Craig Tuminaro, Director of Museum Interpretation.

Through historical and archaeological research, the staff at Drayton Hall are contributing to the ever-widening historical record of Charleston and Drayton Hall. A new interactive and interesting website engages visitors before they arrive. Preserving and interpreting Drayton Hall and its environs in order to educate the public is their mission.
Drayton Hall is a unique house museum in that there is no furniture and the house is merely preserved—no restoration, no rehabilitation, etc. Drayton Hall is a great example of good preservation—but it fits Drayton Hall’s case. This way of preserving may not be the best way for other historic sites.

Left: When restoring Ashley River Road facade columns, graffiti was found. Workers left the patch and a protective case will be placed over the writing. Inside the house, historic graffiti was also found on a hall closet door.



Above: Detail of decorative moldings, medallions, and a family sitting room.


Above: The Ashley River as seen from the banks of the Drayton Hall property. Beyond the second line of trees are new subdivisions. The fact that this is not visable from the historc site is a testament to successes in preserving historic landscapes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our next stop was Charlestown Landing State Historic Site.Charles Towne Landing State Historic Site is owned and operated by South Carolina State Parks. For more information, go to http://www.southcarolinaparks.com/park-finder/state-park/1575.aspx or Friends of Charles Towne Landing, http://www.charlestowne.org/.

Interpreting cultural landscapes such as Charles Town Landing can be difficult when historical and archaeological evidence does not correspond. Al Hester, Historic Site Coordinator with the Park’s Central Office and John Hiatt, Park Interpreter met with us to discuss the park and its issues. Charles Towne Landing encompasses several layers of landscape history: European Settlement, 1670-1680; Plantation Era, 1680-1865; Legare-Waring Era, late 19th century to 1969; and Commemorative Layer, 1970-present.

Park Interpreters have a task ahead of them to find the correct balance between what should be done in cultural landscape settings and what should not be done. Features within the site should be presented correctly and for a purpose. Randomly erecting buildings or structures then adding waysides does not make a historic site. Before Park staff at Charles Towne Landing erect or interpret more, they need to determine what is fact and what is not historically accurate. However, I did like their idea in interpreting the African-American cemetery and the earth fast colonial dwelling was exciting. Hiatt’s idea to install scents within the building was not.